EA doesn't care about people who aren't investors.


  • EA doesn't care about people who aren't investors. Eliminating Kaepernick's name from tunes in Madden two years in a row reveals it. Companies do not want one to defend them, let their attorneys do this work. But we should not praise a business for reaching the absolute bare minimum. It feels just like throwing a party for when your friend says"Hey guys I'm not racist" after he said the N word a year ago. We ought to praise companies who show patterns of positivity. Feel free to disagree, but please don't behave like this specific case is this incredibly complicated morally-grey circumstance. I mean I thought there were pretty strict regulations whose titles and likeliness can be utilized in Madden. Just like Belicheck and Payton aren't in Madden because they aren't part of the NFLCA and that is who EA has a contract with. They may need to cover Kap if his title is used and are probably avoiding that. That Madden 21 coins and Kap is not just welcome in the NFL planet (not speaking about lovers ) anymore.

    They backpeddled and apologized if they were called out. They do not have rights to Kap's likeness in the game however they can cite him in the tune (as they have plenty of additional people figures in other tunes ). The simple fact that they did so two years in a row indicates it was not an innocent oversight but a genuine choice to collaborate with a fundamentally racist act of collusion within the NFL. I am not defending a provider. I am not saying EA is a bastion of justice. Many people in general (not just reddit) can't see past black and white. Cynicism inspires outrage and outrage inspires clicks. That's why negativity floats to the best in all societal media. That is why negativity floats to the top in most social websites. This is a significant element. Youtube for one has done research, since it's a huge portion of their business and they would like to know it. There has been testimony to congress about it that I've watched but can not find right now. What they need is engagement and the more negatively framed something is the more people will click it as it comes up on your recommendations.

    Companies do not want one to defend themlet their lawyers do this work. "Firms do not need you to defend them", but somehow attacking businesses when they are doing the right thing is necessary and productive?It does not matter if it is for PR reasons, they are still raising awareness to this issue and hurting nobody by doing this process. Meanwhile the men and women who see this as an chance to attack are only perpetuating a negative feeling of continuous complaining. It's not so much about"protecting businesses" but about attacking this naturally negativity. So you are really only adding to the guy's argument by doing precisely what he described. They're not doing anything however. They simply released a statement full of empty rhetoric. You understand what doing something is? Not making another Madden game because the NFL punished players enjoy Kaepernick for taking a knee. That would be impressive. But we all know that's not what is going to occur.

    The simple fact that people here are really acting like this can be a meaningful gesture is so fucking baffling. EA literally went out of its way to scrub his name from their matches two years straight, but this thread is making it seem like they have contributed millions. It's the definition of slacktivism. It'd be more honest when they had said nothing in any way. I never mentioned"Let us strike a company for doing the ideal thing." Actions speak louder than words. You can remain optimistic of things looking up, which I often am. If your friend hurts your feelings, then they must regain your confidence. You don't thank them every time from then on whenever they are being nice.

    You don't thank them every time from then on if they are being nice. Wait, why don't you? If a friend of mine hurt me and made an attempt to be fine I would absolutely need to tell them I appreciate their efforts. Positive reinforcement is a great thing. It helps humans behave better, who is to say it can not create a corporation act better too? If EA derived no benefits from"doing the bare minimum of human decency" then they wouldn't do even the bare minimum. It is worth rewarding them for this like it is worth rewarding a problem kid for doing their best to get a day. The difference is that you positively reinforce ACTION, not words. Benefits come from good behaviour, you should not be on good behavior for the added benefits. After I visit EA contribute to the causes or implement initiatives to help out black developers or items of this sort, then I'll praise them. We just should demand a higher standard and stop permitting firms off the hook so easily. I am of the mindset which offset civilization is largely poor and people should be encouraged to change and enhance. But we should not let ourselves to be performed by firms that are, at the end of the cheap Mut 21 coins afternoon, trying to remove all obstacles in the means of getting our cash. I've been burnt by false promises a lot of times.